Milady Maker - FloorDAO Treasury

Collections
1

Report: FloorDAO - Milady Maker Research Report - Google Docs

Status: Proposed

Edit: Flagged for “spam” lol

2

Analysis of May 2021 NFT project

  1. Value of Influencer previous and future conference speaking engagements prices compared to Conference 3 in 1 initial access price points. While absorbing conferences through treasury produced liquidity had short term benefits. The current business model does not seem sustainable past 3 year commitment level.

  2. Version2 PFPs floor value could indicate Development team over production of inventory caused further dilution of one of the highest paid influencers reputation in tech brand communities. Will reputable harms decrease long term revenue model even further in future valuations. Only a Version3 release could further data point this thesis.

  3. Community utility being exposed as vaporware as engagement continues to dwindle. Method does not seem Sustainable.

  4. Long term Intellectual Property revenue model: licenses agreement cost of acquisition vs revenue production.

  5. Inevitability of crypto bear market easily forecasted based on decade plus Bitcoin model use case. Early adopters initial euphoria results in branded community demising the brand for short term liquidity. Bear markets exposes decades trade secrets. Is Brands transactional method of relationships building causing all time low energy output? Is Community questioning acquisition methods decreasing market share in the PFPs space.

  6. Effect on treasury on community sentiment as they compare brand previous content vs ability to affect change becomes minimal.

  7. Choose to be categorized as PFP on open sea instead of membership to distance themselves from utility offers.

  8. High royalties percentage compared to competitors decreasing resale value of token. Study blur dump to stress thesis point. Will new consumers continue to associate with brand with long term consumer confidence issues?

  9. Pressure to monetize scholarship applicants to PFP into the community left bad taste in attention economy mouth.

  10. Burn mechanism could produce liquidity for long term revenue as numerous failed thesis have given community unparalleled ability to reduce NFT inventory cause of large pool opportunities Consumers get tired of flywheel methods so ability to create deflationary behaviors as a coping method to aligning to brand’s reputation for sale marketing campaign rollout in May 2021 bull market.

  11. Pressure community members to liquidate positions for influencers copyright material for unrevealed NFT mint. Honeypot thesis.

Value Prop

  1. PFP art for Version1 not aesthetically pleasing with high Dev royalty fees 10%. Version2 Art superior with lower royalties 6.55% however over production causing internal pressure to burn inventory to reach initial public price release. Does burning show lack of confidence in digital collectible art value?
  2. Conference access. Original mint community demanded work around of selling their tickets while keeping original Digital assest. Lagging ticket price demand shows lack of interest in mega events at this market inflection point. This product could be discontinued in Q2 of 2024 or severely altered to meet market demand.
  3. Influencer personal utility contributions. Not sustainable in effort without increased consumer support.
  4. Could revenue from previously owned, collected and curated intellectual property provide enough liquidity for long term business model?

Use case- minted generation one token. Diamond handed the token till 2025. Passed on purchasing more community project tokens. Sold all your airdrops. Attended no events and sold your token for more than 1 ETH you are entitled to no transaction fee token from our treasury.